Legal Opinion
Schott Optical Glass, Inc. v. United States
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided December 20, 1979No. C.A.D. 1239; No. 79-18PublishedCited by 66 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Milleb, Judge.
This is an appeal from the judgment of the U.S. Customs Court in Schott Optical Glass, Inc. v. United States, 82 Cust. Ct. 11, C.D. 4783 (1979), which affirmed the denial by the Customs Service of Schott’s protest to classification of its imported merchandise as “optical glass.” We affirm.
Background
The imported merchandise consists of pieces of glass which are 6X inches square and colored in shades of red, green, blue, yellow, and gray. It was classified under Tariff Schedules of the United States (TSUS) item 540.67 1 as “optical glass.” Schott claimed classification as colored…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Trans-Atlantic Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
- Nomura (America) Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
- Schott Optical Glass, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1979
- United States v. Leroy Harris, Jr., United States of America v. Albert Joseph LongCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1972
- United States v. Rembrandt Electronics, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by66 opinions
- Phone-Mate, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988
- United States v. Hemant Patel, Raoji Patel, Bridgewater Development Co., and Pacific Food Beverages, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Lonza, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Deckers Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- Schott Optical Glass, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.