Legal Opinion
Arthur J. Humphreys, Inc. v. The United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided August 24, 1992No. 92-1032PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SKELTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
In this case plaintiff Arthur J. Hum-phreys, Inc. challenges the classification of embossed vegetable hardboard fiber panels manufactured in Canada by a company named Canfor, and imported by it into the United States during the years 1980-1981 through plaintiff, its customhouse broker who entered the merchandise on behalf of Canfor. The panels were embossed to resemble brick, stucco, stone or wood patterns. Some were subjected to V-grooving on the face and portions of the edges, while the brick, stucco and stone patterns were cut to form straight edges. The…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Jarvis Clark Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Brookside Veneers, Ltd. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Jarvis Clark Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Nippon Kogaku (USA), Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1982
- Digital Equipment Corporation v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Asociacion Colombiana De Exportadores De Flores v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1998
- Asociacion Colombiana De Exportadores De Flores v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1998
- Faus Group, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2004
- United States v. UPS Customhouse Brokerage, Inc.United States Court of International Trade · 2010
- Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2000
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.