Legal Opinion
Mirshak v. Joyce
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided January 14, 1987No. 82 C 6846PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ANN C. WILLIAMS, District Judge.
The plaintiff William J. Mirshak (“plaintiff”) has filed a four-count amended complaint against the defendants Jeremiah Joyce (“Joyce”), Vincent Gavin (“Gavin”), William Dart (“Dart”), Julia B. Girsch (“Girsch”), Thomas J. Fox and Theresa Fox (“Foxes”). In Count I of the amended complaint, the plaintiff alleges that Joyce, acting under the color of state law, deprived the plaintiff of his fourteenth amendment rights in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1983. In Count II, the plaintiff alleges another cause of action based on Section 1983…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Powell v. McCormackSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Naegele v. AlbersDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- Nwachukwu v. RooneyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- Canady v. Erbe Elektromedizin GmbHDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
- Nwachukwu v. KarlDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
- Easter House, an Illinois, Not-For-Profit Corporation v. Thomas Felder, Florence McGuire and Joan SatoloeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.