Legal Opinion
Nwachukwu v. Karl
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided June 18, 2003No. Civ.A. No. 02-0469(RMU)PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
URBINA, District Judge.
Denying the Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike
I. INTRODUCTION
This action arises out of a former attorney-client relationship between the parties. In a prior relationship, the pro se plaintiff hired the defendant as his attorney. He now alleges that the defendant committed various misdeeds as the plaintiffs lawyer. The matter comes before the court on the plaintiffs motion to strike the defendant’s answer to the plaintiffs amended complaint. Because the plaintiffs objections to the defendant’s answer lack merit, the court denies the plaintiffs motion.
II.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Fogerty v. Fantasy, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Sparrow, Victor H. v. United Airlines IncCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2000
- Fantasy, Inc. v. FogertyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Brian P. Moore v. Agency for International DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993
- Stabilisierungsfonds Fur Wein v. Kaiser Stuhl Wine Distributors Pty. Ltd.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Nwachukwu v. KarlDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
- Nugent v. Unum Life Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Uzlyan v. SolisDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Franco v. National Capital Revitalization Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- Smith v. Washington Post CompanyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.