Legal Opinion
Canady v. Erbe Elektromedizin GmbH
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 5, 2004No. CIV.A.96-2012 (RMU)PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Denying the Defendants’ Motions to Strike and for Entry of Default Judgment; Striking the Parties’ Summary-Judgment Submissions; and Setting a Revised Briefing Schedule
URBINA, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This patent matter presents a textbook example of how Rambo-style litigation tactics prevent the just and speedy determination of a ease. After the court resolved the case by granting the defendants summary judgment on their non-infringement counterclaim, and following the Federal Circuit’s affirmance of that decision, the court granted the plaintiffs partial relief from…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Gary R. Eitel v. William D. McCoolCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- David Nathaniel Jackson v. Malcolm Beech David Nathaniel Jackson v. Malcolm BeechCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- Stratoflex, Inc. v. Aeroquip CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Williams v. SpencerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Alexander v. Washington Gas Light Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 2006
- Jordan v. United States Department of LaborDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Partridge v. Am. Hosp. Mgmt. Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
- Smith v. Washington Post CompanyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.