Legal Opinion
Naegele v. Albers
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided January 3, 2005No. Civil Action 03-2507 (RMU)PublishedCited by 67 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
URBINA, District Judge.
Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendant Michaelson’s Motion to Dismiss; Denying the Plaintiff’s Motions for Sanctions; Denying the Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike Defendant Michaelson’s Response Document; Denying the Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike the Notice of Automatic Stay; Granting the Defendants’ Motion to Stay; and Denying all Remaining Motions as Moot
I. INTRODUCTION
The plaintiff brings this eight count complaint against Deanna Albers, Raymond Albers, II, Lloyd Michaelson, and Does 1 through 10 (collectively, “the defendants”) alleging, inter…
2Cases cited73 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by67 opinions
- Bush v. ButlerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- The Urban Institute v. Fincon ServicesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Jordan v. United States Department of LaborDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Lewy v. Southern Poverty Law Center, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Aristocrat Leisure Ltd. v. Deutsche Bank Trust Co. AmericasDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.