Legal Opinion

Gardner Displays Company v. The United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided June 11, 1965No. 336-56PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Per curiam

This case was referred pursuant to former Rule 45(a), now Rule 57(a), to Trial Commissioner C. Murray Bernhardt with directions to make findings of fact and recommendation for a conclusion of law. The commissioner has done so in an opinion and report filed on March 3, 1964. Exceptions were filed by the defendant, briefs were filed by the parties and the case was submitted to the court on oral argument of counsel. Since the court agrees with the commissioner’s findings, his opinion, and his recommended conclusion of law, as hereinafter set

forth, it hereby adopts the same as the basis for its…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. Blair Ex Rel. Roanoke Marble & Granite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Severin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1943
  3. United States v. RiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. Ramsey v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1951
  5. F. H. McGraw & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1955

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Mega Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
  2. Southern Nuclear Operating Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
  3. Coast Federal Bank, FSB v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
  4. Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
  5. Dairyland Power Cooperative v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API