Legal Opinion
Lee v. Nash
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided November 9, 1983No. A-8201-00001; A26132PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNewman, J.
Plaintiff appeals from a judgment for defendant, an attorney, entered after plaintiffs amended complaint for invasion of privacy and malpractice was dismissed. She assigns as error that the court granted defendant’s motion to dismiss her amended complaint. ORCP 21A(8). We reverse.
As her first count, for invasion of privacy, plaintiff alleges that she and her then husband as co-petitioners retained an attorney (not defendant) to file a Chapter 13 wage earner plan in the United States Bankruptcy Court for Oregon; that her husband subsequently retained defendant to represent him; that plaintiff…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- McEvoy v. HeliksonOregon Supreme Court · 1977
- Currey v. ButcherOregon Supreme Court · 1900
- Chard v. GaltonOregon Supreme Court · 1977
- Irwin v. AshurstOregon Supreme Court · 1937
- Troutman v. ErlandsonOregon Supreme Court · 1979
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Hulse v. Ocwen Federal Bank, FSBDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2002
- McGrew v. Heinold Commodities, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1986
- Mantia v. HansonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
- Wollam v. BrandtCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
- Stock West Corporation, an Oregon Corporation v. Michael TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.