Legal Opinion

Wollam v. Brandt

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 27, 1998No. CV95-314; CA A94122PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.

Plaintiff appeals the grant of summary judgment to defendant Brandt in an action stemming from an employment dispute. Plaintiff initially brought the action against Brandt, Brandt’s law firm, Deborah Cathers, Richard Powell, Chehalem Youth and Family Services (CYFS) and Friends of Chehalem House, Inc. Brandt moved for summary judgment as to the counts against him — invasion of privacy, interference with contract and defamation — on the ground that the act on which those counts were based was absolutely privileged. Following the trial court’s grant of summary judgment to Brandt, plaintiff…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Jones v. General Motors Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Ramstead v. MorganOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Wallulis v. DymowskiOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Chard v. GaltonOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Irwin v. AshurstOregon Supreme Court · 1937

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Hopkins v. O'CONNORSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
  2. Mantia v. HansonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  3. Wynn v. EarinWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Wynn v. EarinWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Hiber v. Creditors Collection Service of Lincoln County, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1998

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API