Legal Opinion

McGrew v. Heinold Commodities, Inc.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided August 19, 1986No. 85-2085PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scariano

Plaintiff, Douglas McGrew, appeals from the dismissal of eight counts of his amended complaint against a former creditor and the creditor’s attorney as a result of their issuance of garnishment summonses when he owed them no money. We affirm in part and dismiss the appeal in part.

On or about March 15, 1982, plaintiff opened a commodities account with defendant Heinold Commodities, upon which he traded without incident until about October 21, 1982, when his account was alleged to have a deficiency of $1,097.73. Not having received payment, defendants filed suit against plaintiff on January 5,…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Cunningham v. BrownIllinois Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Florsheim v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  3. Robyn Douglass, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Hustler Magazine, Inc., Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee, and Augustin GregoryCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
  4. Morrow v. L. A. Goldschmidt Associates, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Leopold v. LevinIllinois Supreme Court · 1970

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Patricia Hennessy v. Penril Datacomm Networks, Incorporated and Richard BurnsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
  2. Ahmad Baravati v. Josephthal, Lyon & Ross, Incorporated, and Peter SheibCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
  3. Tucker v. MarcusWisconsin Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Kemner v. Monsanto Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  5. Berkos v. National Broadcasting Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1987

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API