Irwin v. Ashurst
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBelt, J.
This is an action to recover damages against the defendants who are alleged to’have conspired to defame the character of the plaintiff. At the conclusion of the plaintiff’s case in chief, the motion of the defendant Ashurst for nonsuit was allowed, but the cause was submitted to the jury as to the other defendants, resulting in a verdict in their favor. From the judgments of dismissal, the plaintiff appeals.
The facts out of which this action arose are as follows : The plaintiff was a witness for the State in a criminal action being tried in the circuit court for Klamath county, wherein one…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Youmans v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
- Andrews v. . GardinerNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Watts v. GerkingOregon Supreme Court · 1924
- Shaw v. MoonOregon Supreme Court · 1926
- Lawson v. HicksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1862
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Ramstead v. MorganOregon Supreme Court · 1959
- Bob Godfrey Pontiac, Inc. v. RoloffOregon Supreme Court · 1981
- Henry W. Petty v. General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corporation, Ltd., and Potomac Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1966
- Summit Hotel Co. v. National Broadcasting Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Chard v. GaltonOregon Supreme Court · 1977
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.