Legal Opinion

McEvoy v. Helikson

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 1977No. TC 75-488, SC 24484PublishedCited by 92 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTongue, J.

This is an action for damages for malpractice and negligence against an attorney by the former husband of the attorney’s client. Defendant demurred to the complaint on the ground that as a matter of law the defendant, as an attorney, owed no legal duty to plaintiff, who was not his client. That demurrer was sustained. Plaintiff appeals from the resulting judgment for defendant.

Plaintiff’s complaint (with attached documents) alleged that he was the father and Susan McEvoy, his former wife (and defendant’s client) was the mother of a minor child; that plaintiff and Susan McEvoy were divorced by…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hinish v. Meier & Frank Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Mezyk v. National Repossessions, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Harding v. BellOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Pickle v. PageNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  5. Aune v. Oregon Trunk RailwayOregon Supreme Court · 1935

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by92 opinions

  1. Fazzolari v. Portland School District No. 1JOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Brennen v. City of EugeneOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Norwest v. Presbyterian Intercommunity HospitalOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Flaherty v. WeinbergCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  5. Buchler v. Oregon Corrections Div.Oregon Supreme Court · 1993

87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API