Legal Opinion
United States v. King
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 13, 2012No. 11-10182PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM Opinion; Concurrence by Judge GRABER; Concurrence by Judge TALLMAN.
OPINION
2Per curiam
Defendant Marcel Daron King appeals his conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). He challenges the district court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence obtained during a warrantless probation search of his room.1 We review de novo a district court’s denial of a motion to suppress. United States v. Mayer, 560 F.3d 948, 956 (9th Cir.2009). Underlying findings of fact are reviewed for clear error. Id. We affirm.
On May 10, 2010, San Francisco Police…
3Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. German Espinoza Montero-Camargo, United States of America v. Lorenzo Sanchez-GuillenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Candelario Angulo-LopezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Herman Patayan SorianoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Timothy A. BishopCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. MayerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by11 opinions
- United States v. KingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. KingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- United States v. Marcel KingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- United States v. Carlos AsprillaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. KingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.