Legal Opinion

United States v. King

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 13, 2012No. 11-10182Published

1Opinion of the Court

672 F.3d 1133 (2012)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

Marcel Daron KING, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 11-10182.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted February 13, 2012.

Filed March 13, 2012.

Daniel P. Blank, Assistant Federal Public Defender, San Francisco, CA, for the defendant-appellant.

Suzanne B. Miles, Assistant United States Attorney, San Francisco, CA, for the plaintiff-appellee.

Before: SUSAN P. GRABER, MARSHA S. BERZON, and RICHARD C. TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM Opinion; Concurrence by Judge GRABER; Concurrence by Judge TALLMAN.

OPINION

2Per curiam

Defendant…

Also in this document: Concurrence; Concurring in the judgment.

3Cases cited18 opinions

  1. United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. United States v. ArvizuSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Alabama v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. United States v. KnightsSupreme Court of the United States · 2001

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API