Legal Opinion
United States v. Herman Patayan Soriano
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 11, 2004No. 01-50461PublishedCited by 112 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge CLIFTON; Dissent by Judge BERZON
ORDER
CLIFTON, Circuit Judge.
The opinion and the dissenting opinion filed October 15, 2003, and published at *497346 F.3d 963 (9th Cir.2003), are amended as follows:
The opinion is amended by adding a new footnote 4, 346 F.3d at 975, at the end of the first sentence of the concluding paragraph: “For the foregoing reasons, we affirm the denial of Soriano’s motion to suppress, and thus affirm his conviction.4”
We feel compelled to note, however, that we believe that the dissenting opinion, as amended, contains significant misstatements, particularly…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Bumper v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by112 opinions
- Michael Lacey v. Joseph ArpaioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Center for Bio-Ethical Reform, Inc. v. Los Angeles County Sheriff DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Crowe v. County of San DiegoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. SmallsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- Alejandro Velazquez v. City of Long BeachCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
107 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.