Legal Opinion

United States v. Marcel King

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 8, 2013No. 11-10182PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by Judge GRABER; Dissent by Judge BERZON.

OPINION

GRABER, Circuit Judge:

Defendant Marcel Daron King appeals his conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g). The question that we must answer is whether the Fourth Amendment permits a suspicionless search1 of a proba*988tioner’s residence. We hold that such a search is permissible when, as here, the probationer has accepted a suspicionless-search condition as part of a probation agreement. We therefore affirm.

Officers of the San Francisco Police Department suspected that Defendant was involved in…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Griffin v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. United States v. KnightsSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  3. Samson v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  4. People v. BravoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  5. People v. WoodsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. KingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  2. Murry v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 2014
  3. Murry v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 2014
  4. United States v. Marcel KingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API