United States v. Marcel King
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge GRABER; Dissent by Judge BERZON.
OPINION
GRABER, Circuit Judge:
Defendant Marcel Daron King appeals his conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g). The question that we must answer is whether the Fourth Amendment permits a suspicionless search1 of a proba*988tioner’s residence. We hold that such a search is permissible when, as here, the probationer has accepted a suspicionless-search condition as part of a probation agreement. We therefore affirm.
Officers of the San Francisco Police Department suspected that Defendant was involved in…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Griffin v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- United States v. KnightsSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Samson v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- People v. BravoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- People v. WoodsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. KingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Murry v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 2014
- Murry v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 2014
- United States v. Marcel KingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013