State Ex Rel. City of South Euclid v. Zangerle
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.
The county auditor, respondent herein, refused to place the special assessments for street lighting and the reassessments on the tax list and duplicate on the ground that liens therefor were discharged by the forfeited land sale.
The question is whether the Court of Appeals committed prejudicial error in upholding the action of the respondent and dismissing relator’s petition.
Under Section 3897, General Code, a special assessment is from the date of the assessment a lien upon the lots and parcels of land assessed. By virtue of Section 3812-4, General Code, special assessments may be levied and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Smith v. New York Central Rd.Ohio Supreme Court · 1930
- Keefe v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Municipal Investors Ass'n v. City of BirminghamMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
- Keefe v. Oakland County Drain CommissionerMichigan Supreme Court · 1943
- In re Report of Commissioners of ElizabethSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1887
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Van Fossen v. Babcock & Wilcox Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
- Martin v. Board of Assessment AppealsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
- Schoenrade v. TracyOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Fraternal Order of Police v. HunterMahoning County Court of Common Pleas · 1973
- Ray v. JonesOhio Court of Appeals · 1950
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.