Smith v. New York Central Rd.
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMarshall, C. J.
The sole question for determination in both of these controversies is whether the amendment of Section 11224, reducing the period within which personal injury suits may be brought from four years to two years, will apply to causes of action existing at the time of the effective date of the enactment. Neither of the controversies was a pending suit at the time of such effective date, and both controversies were existing causes of action on that date. The same legal questions therefore apply to both, and will therefore be considered and decided together.
The case concerns the statute of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bank of Columbia v. OkelySupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Terry v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Kelley v. State ex rel. GellnerOhio Supreme Court · 1916
3Cited by71 opinions
- Van Fossen v. Babcock & Wilcox Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
- Bielat v. BielatOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- Gregory v. FlowersOhio Supreme Court · 1972
- Kilbreath v. RudyOhio Supreme Court · 1968
- Wilfong v. BatdorfOhio Supreme Court · 1983
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.