Legal Opinion

Keefe v. Oakland County Drain Commissioner

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 11, 1943No. Docket No. 63, Calendar No. 42,415PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBushnell, J.

Plaintiffs Keefe and Bradford have appealed from a declaratory judgment which determined that defendants, drain commissioner and board of supervisors of Oakland county, are not obligated, by Act No. 316, chap. 10, § 18, Pub. Acts 1923, as amended by Act No. 331, Pub. Acts 1927 (1 Comp. Laws 1929, § 4940), and Act No. 129, Pub. Acts 1939 (Comp. Laws Supp. 1940, §4940, Stat. Ann. 1942 Cum. Supp. §11.104), to levy an additional assessment to cover the deficiency in a drain tax. Plaintiffs are the owners of bonds, which are a part of an original issue in 1927, of $300,000, to finance the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Gast Realty & Investment Co. v. Schneider Granite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. Baker v. State Land Office BoardMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Municipal Investors Ass'n v. City of BirminghamMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Municipal Investors Assn. v. BirminghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1942

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State Highway Commissioner v. Detroit City ControllerMichigan Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Keefe v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Schreiber v. County of CookIllinois Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Metropolitan Funeral System Ass'n v. Commissioner of InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Young v. Thendara, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1950

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API