Keefe v. Oakland County Drain Commissioner
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBushnell, J.
Plaintiffs Keefe and Bradford have appealed from a declaratory judgment which determined that defendants, drain commissioner and board of supervisors of Oakland county, are not obligated, by Act No. 316, chap. 10, § 18, Pub. Acts 1923, as amended by Act No. 331, Pub. Acts 1927 (1 Comp. Laws 1929, § 4940), and Act No. 129, Pub. Acts 1939 (Comp. Laws Supp. 1940, §4940, Stat. Ann. 1942 Cum. Supp. §11.104), to levy an additional assessment to cover the deficiency in a drain tax. Plaintiffs are the owners of bonds, which are a part of an original issue in 1927, of $300,000, to finance the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Gast Realty & Investment Co. v. Schneider Granite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Baker v. State Land Office BoardMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
- Municipal Investors Ass'n v. City of BirminghamMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
- Municipal Investors Assn. v. BirminghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- State Highway Commissioner v. Detroit City ControllerMichigan Supreme Court · 1951
- Keefe v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Schreiber v. County of CookIllinois Supreme Court · 1944
- Metropolitan Funeral System Ass'n v. Commissioner of InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1951
- Young v. Thendara, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1950
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.