Legal Opinion

Schoenrade v. Tracy

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 3, 1996No. Nos. 94-1102 and 94-1245PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

The sole question presented by these cases is the validity of the tax assessments made after the expiration of the three-year statute of limitations, which was in effect when the income tax returns were filed, but prior to the expiration of the four-year statute of limitations, which became effective after the income tax returns were filed.

The taxpayers argue that a legislative change in the statute of limitations, made after the income tax returns were filed, may not prolong the statute of limitations in effect at the time the returns were filed. The Tax Commissioner contends that when an…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Van Fossen v. Babcock & Wilcox Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Gregory v. FlowersOhio Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Kilbreath v. RudyOhio Supreme Court · 1968
  4. State Ex Rel. City of South Euclid v. ZangerleOhio Supreme Court · 1945

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. Braden (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2019
  2. State v. Braden (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Schafer v. DeszczOhio Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. State v. RobertsOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Nichols v. VillarrealOhio Court of Appeals · 1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API