Legal Opinion

Fraternal Order of Police v. Hunter

Mahoning County Court of Common Pleas

Decided May 2, 1973No. 73 CI 133PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRigelhaupt, J.

This is an action wherein the plaintiffs pray the court to determine their rights and duties as to residency under the laws of the state of Ohio, and the Rules and Regulations of the Civil Service Commission of the city of Youngstown; and, further, that Rule IY, Section 9(F) of the Youngstown Civil Service Commission (hereinafter referred to as the Rule) requiring residency of a tenured civil service employee he declared invalid.

Said Rule was adopted Jan. 20, 1972, and is as follows:

“Any officer or employee not residing within the city limits of Youngstown, except as otherwise provided in…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. United States v. GuestSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Kent v. DullesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. Walla Walla City v. Walla Walla Water Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
  5. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. City of GoldsboroSupreme Court of the United States · 1914

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Spradling v. HutchinsonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Miller v. KrawczykDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1976
  3. Bill Call Ford, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1993
  4. Spradling v. HutchinsonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API