Legal Opinion

Griffith v. City of Los Angeles

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 16, 1959No. Civ. 23717PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VALLÉE, J.

Appeal by plaintiff from an adverse judg ment in a suit for an injunction to restrain defendants from further acts in connection with a project designated Toyon Canyon Park Reclamation in Griffith Park, Los Angeles, and for declaratory relief.

On March 5, 1898, plaintiff’s parents conveyed to the city of Los Angeles some 3,800 acres of land known as Griffith Park. The conveyance was made on these conditions:

“To be used as a Public Park for purposes of recreation, health and pleasure, for the use and benefit of the inhabitants of the said City of Los Angeles, forever. And this gift…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. In Re PetersenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  2. McCarthy v. City of Manhattan BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Sunny Slope Water Co. v. City of PasadenaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  4. McCaslin v. City of Monterey ParkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  5. Griffith v. Department of Public WorksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Faus v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  2. King v. City of DallasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
  3. Lyons v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  4. Tomkins v. Village of Tinley ParkDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API