Legal Opinion
Sunny Slope Water Co. v. City of Pasadena
California Supreme Court
Decided May 31, 1934No. L. A. 13194, 14004PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
The City of Pasadena and certain of the city officials appeal from a judgment determining that a certain zoning ordinance and a so-called boiler ordinance of the City of Pasadena are inapplicable to respondent, and also appeal from the order taxing costs. The facts giving rise to the controversy are as follows f
Since 1895 the respondent Sunny Slope Water Company has been engaged in the business of owning, developing and acquiring water, water rights and waterworks, and in distributing water at cost to its stockholders in a territory embracing some 2,282 acres. For many years…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Soon Hing v. CrowleySupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Miller v. Board of Public Works of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Jones v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- In Re SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Tobe v. City of Santa AnaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Selby Realty Co. v. City of San BuenaventuraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Lockard v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- City of Los Angeles v. GageCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Consolidated Rock Products Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.