Legal Opinion

City of Hudson v. Industrial Commission

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 16, 1942PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosenberry, C. J.

Two questions are presented for decision: (1) Was W. T. Davis a contractor under respondent, city of Hudson, at the time of the accident? (2) Was A. F. Peavey an employer of Paap at the time of the accident and also liable for payment of compensation to Paap?

1. Sec. 102.06, Stats. 1939, provided:

“An employer shall be liable for compensation to an employee of a contractor or subcontractor under him who is not subject to this chapter, or who has not complied with the conditions of subsection (2) of section 102.28 in any case where such employer would have been liable for compensation if such…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Madison Entertainment Corp. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Employers Mutual Liability Insurance v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Wells Coal & Dock Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Green Bay Packaging, Inc. v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Hobbs-Western Company v. CraigSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1946
  3. Springfield Lumber, Feed & Fuel Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Thorsheim v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Boehck Equipment Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1944

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API