Legal Opinion

Madison Entertainment Corp. v. Industrial Commission

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 9, 1933PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWicichem, J.

The question upon this appeal is whether the defendant Lenahan, the employer of Kleinheinz, was a contractor or subcontractor under the plaintiff, Madison Entertainment Corporation, within the meaning of sec. 102.06, Wisconsin Statutes. The facts are not in issue, and the question is solely one of law. Sec. 102.06 provides as follows :

“An employer subject to the provisions of sections 102.03 to 102.34 shall be liable for compensation to an employee of a contractor or subcontractor under him who is not sub*462ject to sections 102.03 to 102.34, or who has not complied with the conditions of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Deep Rock Oil Co. of Wisconsin v. DerouinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Green Bay Packaging, Inc. v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Miami Roofing & Sheet Metal Co. v. KindtSupreme Court of Florida · 1950
  3. Perrin v. American Theatrical CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1944
  4. Hobbs-Western Company v. CraigSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1946
  5. City of Hudson v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1942

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API