Legal Opinion

Employers Mutual Liability Insurance v. Industrial Commission

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 7, 1937PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.

The facts, which are undisputed, are that Thomison was an employee of E. L. Peterson. Peterson was engaged in business on his sole account. He entered into an agreement with the Gagen Lumber Company to sell logs to it. The Lumber Company had formerly done its own logging, but had closed up that department of the business some time before the transactions involved in this case occurred. Peterson was a farmer from whom the Lumber Company had, after it stopped logging on its own account and at different times, bought logs. The Lumber Company lent Peterson money with which he purchased a tract of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Nestle's Food Co. v. Industrial Commission of WisconsinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Madison Entertainment Corp. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Wells Coal & Dock Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
  4. School District No. 1 v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Green Bay Packaging, Inc. v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Miles v. West Virginia Pulp & Paper Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1948
  3. Hobbs-Western Company v. CraigSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1946
  4. Bencivengo v. Walter C. Benson Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
  5. City of Hudson v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API