Legal Opinion

Hobbs-Western Company v. Craig

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 21, 1946No. 4-7792PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoFaddin, J.

Appellants, Hobbs-Western Co. and its insurance carrier, seek to have set aside an award of tbe Workmen’s Compensation Commission in favor of appellees, tbe widow and children of John Craig, deceased workman. Appellants contend that John Craig was an employee of Steve Lea, rather than Hobbs-Western Co., and that Steve Lea was not a subcontractor of Hobbs-Western Co. within the purview of § 6 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law of Arkansas (Act No. 319 of 1939).

The Commission found, that Steve Lea was a subcontractor of Hobbs-Western Co. within § 6 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law. We are asked…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Perkinson v. ThomasSupreme Court of Virginia · 1932
  2. Madison Entertainment Corp. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Williams v. GeorgeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1943
  4. Anthony v. Natalbany Lumber Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1939
  5. City of Hudson v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1942

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Brothers v. Dierks Lumber & Coal Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1950
  2. Bendure v. Great Lakes Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1967
  3. Bailey v. SimmonsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1982
  4. Mason v. LauckSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1960
  5. Liggett Construction Co. v. GriffinCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1982

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API