Legal Opinion

Petti v. Balance Rock Associates

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided September 15, 1987No. 5070PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBieluch, J.

The defendant appeals from the trial court’s judgment rendered for the plaintiff in this action brought under General Statutes § 47-SSd1 for reimbursement for moving and relocation expenses. The *355defendant submits the following claims for our consideration: (1) whether the trial court erred in finding that the defendant was the declarant of Balance Rock Condominiums; (2) whether the trial court erred in applying the provisions of § 47-88d where the plaintiffs occupancy of the converted rental unit was terminated by virtue of a summary process judgment based on nonpayment of rent; (3) whether…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  2. Johnson v. FlammiaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
  3. Texaco Refining & Marketing Co. v. Commissioner of Revenue ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  4. State v. BunkleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  5. Dart & Bogue Co. v. SlosbergSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Hart, Nininger & Campbell Associates v. RogersConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
  2. O'Donnell v. RindfleischConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
  3. Elis v. RogersConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
  4. Lembo v. SchlesingerConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
  5. Licari v. BlackwelderConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API