Legal Opinion
Elis v. Rogers
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided August 2, 1988No. 5671PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBieluch, J.
The plaintiff appeals from the judgment rendered in favor of the defendant in this action for the foreclosure of a mortgage. The plaintiffs principal claim of error is that the trial court erred in allowing testimony relating to a setoff against the underlying mortgage note even though a defense of setoff was not specially pleaded in the defendant’s answer. We find this claim to be unavailing and our conclusion thereon dispositive of the appeal. We find no error.
The facts relevant to this appeal are as follows. On November 1, 1978, the defendant, a real estate salesman and broker, became…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Damora v. Christ-JanerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Savings Bank of New London v. SantanielloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1943
- Petti v. Balance Rock AssociatesConnecticut Appellate Court · 1987
- Peters Production, Inc. v. DawsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Lembo v. SchlesingerConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Angelina Imbrogno Orlando Imbrogno, Stamford Hospital v. Allen C. Chamberlin, Saint Joseph Hospital CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Mariculture Products Ltd. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of LondonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- Bennett v. Automobile InsuranceConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- Lind-Larsen v. Fleet National BankConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- Hope's Architectural Products, Inc. v. Fox Steel Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1997
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.