Legal Opinion
O'Donnell v. Rindfleisch
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided January 5, 1988No. 4985PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBieluch, J.
The plaintiff, Robert O’Donnell, brought this action on August 7,1983, against the defendants, Arthur A. Rindfleisch and Irene M. Rindfleisch, husband and wife, to collect monies allegedly due him for services rendered and materials furnished pursuant to an executed oral agreement to reshingle the roof of the defendants’ house. The defendants have appealed from the judgment rendered for the plaintiff awarding him the amount due pursuant to the parties’ agreement, less certain setoffs awarded to the defendants. We find no error.
This case presents a matter of first impression. The dispositive…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Johnson v. MansonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Texaco Refining & Marketing Co. v. Commissioner of Revenue ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Aaron v. Conservation CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- International Business MacHines Corporation v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
- Doe v. MansonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Meadows v. HigginsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Centimark Corp. v. Village Manor Associates Ltd. PartnershipConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- Lucarelli v. StateConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
- MD Electrical Contractors, Inc. v. AbramsAppellate Court of Illinois · 2006
- Santa Fuel, Inc. v. VargaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.