Lembo v. Schlesinger

The plaintiff brought this action to recover a deposit given to the defendants toward the purchase of a condominium unit. The defendants appeal from the judgment in favor of the plaintiff. They claim *151that certain factual findings of the court are contrary to the evidence, and assert that the court’s conclusion that the plaintiff was entitled to the return of her $2500 deposit plus interest and to a recovery of punitive damages and attorney’s fees pursuant to the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act (CUTPA); General Statutes §§ 42-110a through 42-110q; is contrary to the evidence and the…