Legal Opinion

Dart & Bogue Co. v. Slosberg

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided March 24, 1987No. 12942PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, C. J.

The sole issue in this case, on certification from the United States District Court, is whether certain mortgages, which fail to state the maximum term of the obligation they secure, are invalid against subsequent lien creditors under Connecticut law. The plaintiff, Dart & Bogue Company, Inc., is a debtor-in-possession under chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. § 101 et seq. Exercising the powers of a *568trustee in bankruptcy under 11 U.S.C. § 544,1 the plaintiff brought an adversary proceeding in the United States Bankruptcy Court, District of Connecticut, seeking to invalidate two…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. State v. KishSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  2. Connecticut Light & Power Co. v. CostleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  3. Barrowclough v. Kidder, Peabody & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
  4. State v. WestSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
  5. Pettibone v. GriswoldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1822

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. Simms v. WardenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  2. Cheshire Mortgage Service, Inc. v. MontesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  3. Connecticut Bank & Trust Co. v. Carriage Lane AssociatesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  4. Ambroise v. William Raveis Real Estate, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  5. Lauer v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API