Spencer v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SWEENEY, Judge.
Before the court is plaintiffs application to proceed in forma pauperis and defendant’s motion for summary dismissal of a pro se complaint (“motion for summary dismissal”).1 Defendant moves, pursuant to Rule 12(b) of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”), to dismiss the complaint because plaintiff fails to articulate a claim cognizable in Court of Federal Claims. The court grants plaintiffs application to proceed in forma pauperis. Nevertheless, the court determines that the complaint is frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) and…
2Cases cited57 opinions
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Denton v. HernandezSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Stanwyck v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Dziekonski v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Robinson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Lamson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Johnson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.