Legal Opinion

Johnson v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided January 12, 2016No. 15-776CPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Pro Se; Rule 12(b)(1), Subject-Matter Jurisdiction; Rule 12(b)(6), Failure to State a Claim; 28 U.S.C. § 1915; 28 U.S.C. § 1491(a); 28 U.S.C. § 1346(b)(1); In Forma Pauperis.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

GRIGGSBY, Judge

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff pro se, Melvin Johnson, brought this action challenging the United States Bu reau of Prisons’ decision not to perform surgery to remove fatty tissue from his stomach and seeking $7,000,000 in monetary damages from the United States. The government has moved to dismiss the complaint for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction, pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) of the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lawson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API