Legal Opinion

Dziekonski v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided May 8, 2015No. 14-986CPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pro Se Plaintiff; Lack of Jurisdiction; Americans with Disabilities Act; USERRA; Application to Proceed In Forma Pau-peris

OPINION AND ORDER

SWEENEY, Judge

On October 14, 2014, Kevin Dziekonski (“plaintiff’), appearing pro se, filed a four-page complaint, with 159 pages of exhibits attached thereto, and an application to proceed in forma pauperis. Subsequently, on October 24, 2014, plaintiff filed a six-page amended complaint with a CD-ROM containing more than 645 files and subfiles of exhibits in support, which included 75 PDF and 11 Microsoft Word documents, and totaled approximately 1,900…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
  4. McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  5. Hughes v. RoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Manning v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
  2. Nesselrode v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
  3. Claiborne v. EsperDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2020
  4. Downey v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020
  5. Holland v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API