Legal Opinion
Seaman v. Climate Control Corp.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 29, 1980PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, J.
The sole issue on this appeal is whether a second tier subcontractor has a right to a mechanic’s lien against the owner’s property when the owner owes money to the general contractor, but the first tier subcontractor has been fully paid by the general contractor. The plaintiff, Elmer Seaman (hereinafter Seaman), brought an application in Superior Court, pursuant to General Statutes § 49-35a, to discharge two mechanic’s liens filed by the defendants Climate Control Corporation (hereinafter Climate Control) and Branford N. O. Nelson Co., d/b/a Branford Plumbing and Heating Supply Co.…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Klapproth v. TurnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
- City of Norwalk v. DanieleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
- Bahre v. HogbloomSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Camputaro v. Stuart Hardwood Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Stone v. RosenfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Orticelli v. PowersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Red Rooster Construction Co. v. River Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Ganim v. RobertsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- H & S TORRINGTON ASSOCIATES v. Lutz Engineering Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- FCM Group, Inc. v. MillerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.