Legal Opinion
On the Cheap, LLC v. Does 1-5011
District Court, N.D. California
Decided September 6, 2011No. C10-4472 BZPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER SEVERING DOE DEFENDANTS 1-16 AND 18-5011
BERNARD ZIMMERMAN, United States Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiffs complaint, filed on October 4, 2010 and amended on January 25, 2011, alleges that Doe defendants 1-5011 are liable for copyright infringement because they used BitTorrent software to illegally download or distribute the same adult film, entitled “Danielle Staub Raw.” Docket Nos. 1 and 7.1 On *502January 25, 2011, plaintiff moved for an order granting expedited discovery to allow it to serve subpoenas on defendants’ internet service providers (ISPs) so it could learn the identity of each Doe…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Schwarzenegger v. Fred Martin Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Coleman v. Quaker Oats Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Nu Image, Inc. v. Does 1-23,322District Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Wynn v. National Broadcasting Co., Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- K-Beech, Inc. v. John Does 1-37District Court, E.D. New York · 2012
- Patrick Collins, Inc. v. Doe 1District Court, E.D. New York · 2012
- Almont Ambulatory Surgery Center, LLC v. UnitedHealth Group, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2015
- Pacific Century International, Ltd. v. John Does 1-37District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2012
- Corley v. Google, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2016
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.