Legal Opinion

K-Beech, Inc. v. John Does 1-37

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided July 24, 2012No. Civil Action Nos. 11-3995(DRH)(GRB), 12-1147(JS)(GRB), 12-1150(LDW)(GRB), 12-1154(ADS)(GRB)PublishedCited by 1,014 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Leonard D. Wexler, District Judge.

In light of the dismissal of the John Doe Defendants referred to in the Report and Recommendation, there is no objection thereto and the holding therein is adopted.

ORDER & REPORT & RECOMMENDATION

GARY R. BROWN, United States Magistrate Judge:

These actions are part of a nationwide blizzard of civil actions brought by purveyors of pornographic films alleging copyright infringement by individuals utilizing a computer protocol known as BitTorrent. The putative defendants are identified only by Internet Protocol (“IP”)…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Arista Records, LLC v. Doe 3Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
  2. Sony Music Entertainment Inc. v. Does 1-40District Court, S.D. New York · 2004
  3. Coleman v. Quaker Oats Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  4. Reed Elsevier, Inc. v. MuchnickSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  5. Digital Sin, Inc. v. Does 1-176District Court, S.D. New York · 2012

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1,014 opinions

  1. Rotten Records, Inc. v. DoeDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2015
  2. AF Holdings, LLC v. Does 1-1058Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
  3. Rotten Records, Inc. v. DoeDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2015
  4. Glacier Films (Usa), Inc. v. Andrey TurchinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  5. Malibu Media, LLC v. DoeDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2016

1,009 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API