Legal Opinion
Corley v. Google, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided August 19, 2016No. Case No. 16-CV-00473-LHK, Case No. 16-C V-02553-LHKPublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS TO SEVER
Re: Dkt. No. 96 (No. 16-CV-00473-LHK)
Re: Dkt. No. 20 (No. 16-CV-02553-LHK)
LUCY H. KOH, United States District Judge
Plaintiffs in these cases, Corley v. Google, Inc. (“Corley”), and Amaral v. Google, Inc. (“Amaral”),1 are 879 individuals who had Google Apps for Education accounts from November 1, 2010 to April 30, 2014. Plaintiffs allege that Google, Inc. (“Google”) violated the Wiretap Act by intercepting and scanning Plaintiffs’ emails. Before the Court are Google’s motions to sever, filed in the Corley and Amaral cases. ECF No. 19 (“FAC”); ECF No. 96 (“Mot.”);…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Acuna v. Brown & Root Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
- Coleman v. Quaker Oats Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Katie Lowery v. Honeywell International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
- Gillespie v. CivilettiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- United States v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- (PS) Gastelum v. Arbor Lodging Partners, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
- A.B., A MINOR, BY AND THROUGH HIS GUARDIAN JEN TURNER, et al. v. GOOGLE LLC, et al.District Court, N.D. California · 2026
- Adams v. California Department of Corrections and RehabilitationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2022
- Baker v. Union Pacific Railroad CompanyDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2020
- Boulter v. Kerr-McGee Oil & Gas Onshore, LPDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2025
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.