Legal Opinion
Nu Image, Inc. v. Does 1-23,322
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 29, 2011No. 1:11-mj-00301PublishedCited by 68 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION DENYING MOTION FOR EXPEDITED DISCOVERY
ROBERT L. WILKINS, District Judge.
The Plaintiff in this action, Nu Image, Inc., is a California corporation that allegedly owns the copyright and/or pertinent exclusive rights to a motion picture entitled “The Expendables.” Plaintiff brings this copyright infringement action against 23,322 John Doe Defendants, who have allegedly employed the Internet to use “BitTorrent protocol” or “torrent” software to unlawfully download a pirated copy of Plaintiffs movie onto their computers. The Plaintiff alleges that the BitTorrent technology…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Time, Inc. v. Frank ManningCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
- Fourco Glass Co. v. Transmirra Products Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Caribbean Broadcasting System, Ltd. v. Cable & Wireless PLCCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
- FC Investment Group LC v. IFX Markets, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by68 opinions
- AF Holdings, LLC v. Does 1-1058Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
- Malibu Media, LLC v. DoeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Malibu Media, LLC v. DoeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Shaheen v. SmithDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- On the Cheap, LLC v. Does 1-5011District Court, N.D. California · 2011
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.