Kronkright v. Gardner
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DUNN, J.
Demurrers to plaintiff’s first amended complaint, separately filed by Philip Gardner and Garth G. Gardner, were sustained without leave to amend on the ground no cause of action was stated against either of them, and orders for the dismissal of each defendant were filed (judgments, Code Civ. Proc., § 581d). Thereafter, plaintiff brought separate motions for new trial as to these defendants. After hearing the motions together on July 16, 1971, the trial court entered an order granting plaintiff’s motion as to Garth Gardner, setting aside its dismissal of him and allowing…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Sutphin v. SpeikCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Stewart v. CoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Price v. Sixth District Agricultural Assn.California Supreme Court · 1927
- Carney v. SimmondsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Datta v. StaabCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Eichman v. Fotomat Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1983
- City of Oakland v. Oakland Police & Fire Retirement SystemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Torrey Pines Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Alhino v. StarrCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- Frommhagen v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.