Frommhagen v. Board of Supervisors
California Court of Appeal
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
STONE, J. *
Appellant Laurence H. Frommhagen appeals from a judgment of dismissal entered after the trial court sustained without leave to amend the demurrer filed by respondents Santa Cruz County Board of Supervisors and the County of Santa Cruz. We conclude that the trial court properly sustained the demurrer with respect to the bulk of appellant’s action, but erred in sustaining the demurrer as to two of the allegations in the complaint. Consequently, we reverse the judgment and remand to the trial court for further proceedings on those two allegations only.
I. Facts
In June of 1984,…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Commissioner v. SunnenSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Slater v. BlackwoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Stark v. CokerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Todhunter v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- Busick v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Ojavan Investors, Inc. v. California Coastal Com.California Court of Appeal · 1997
- Planning & Conservation League v. Castaic Lake Water AgencyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Quackenbush v. Aurora National Life Assurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1995
- Tensor Group v. City of GlendaleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- Key v. Tyler, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.