Legal Opinion
Eichman v. Fotomat Corp.
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 14, 1983No. Civ. 26921PublishedCited by 89 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BROWN (Gerald), P. J.
Adrian and Margaret Eichman appeal the judgment entered after the superior court sustained Fotomat Corporation’s demurrer without leave to amend. The Eichmans contend the superior court erred in finding a judgment in an earlier action between the Eichmans and Fotomat is res judicata and bars the present suit.
The Eichmans entered into a franchise agreement with Fotomat in 1968. In 1973 the Eichmans sued Fotomat in the Superior Court of San Bernardino County, alleging Fotomat breached the franchise agreement and violated California’s Unfair Trade Practices Act (Bus.…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Lawlor v. National Screen Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Slater v. BlackwoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Sutphin v. SpeikCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Kachig v. BootheCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Kulchar v. KulcharCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by89 opinions
- Brodheim v. CryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- San Diego Police Officers' Ass'n v. San Diego City Employees' Retirement SystemCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Adrian C. Eichman v. Fotomat Corporation, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Adrian C. Eichman v. Fotomat Corporation, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.