Legal Opinion
Wells-Dickey Trust Co. v. Chicago Burlington & Quincy Railroad
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided May 29, 1924No. 23,948PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDibell, J.
Action to. recover damages for the death of the plaintiff’s intestate. There was judgment for the defendant and the plaintiff appeals.
The deceased, Elmer E. Anderson, was employed by the defendant in interstate commerce. While so employed he was killed on November 1, 1920, by the negligence of other employes of the defendant. *418He left no wife nor child. His father was dead. His mother survived him but died on May 5, 1921, prior to the commencement of this action. The deceased left a sister, Ada C. Anderson, who was dependent upon him. She is his sole dependent next of kin.
Upon these facts…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Michigan Central Railroad v. VreelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- North Carolina Railroad v. ZacharySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Johnson v. Southern Pacific Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. McGinnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- American Railroad Co. of Porto Rico v. DidricksenSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Wichert v. CardwellWashington Supreme Court · 1991
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. Wells-Dickey Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Windom National Bank v. KleinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
- Teders v. RothermelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
- State Ex Rel. v. M. St. P. S. S. M. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.