Windom National Bank v. Klein
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
STONE, Justice.
Plaintiffs appeal from an order sustaining a general demurrer to their complaint, which makes the facts appear as follows:
During the period here determinative and for many years before, Gottlob, Howard G., Gustave, and Matthias Bender, as partners, have owned and operated a dairy farm, the firm name being Bender Brothers. Windom National Bank has ' an unsatisfied judgment against Howard G. and Gottlob for upwards of $1,500. Proceeding under § 28 of the uniform partnership act (2 Mason Minn. St. 1927, § 7411), it procured the appointment of its coplaintiff, Gillam, as receiver…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Malvern National Bank v. HallidaySupreme Court of Iowa · 1923
- Hazen v. WarwickMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
- Kilduff v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
- Wells-Dickey Trust Co. v. Chicago Burlington & Quincy RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- In re the Estate of DumarestNew York Surrogate's Court · 1933
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- In Re DeckerDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1969
- Smith v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1948
- Gleason v. SingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
- State v. ElsburyNevada Supreme Court · 1946
- Cecil G. Noble v. National Mines CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.