Legal Opinion

Windom National Bank v. Klein

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 27, 1934No. 29,815PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STONE, Justice.

Plaintiffs appeal from an order sustaining a general demurrer to their complaint, which makes the facts appear as follows:

During the period here determinative and for many years before, Gottlob, Howard G., Gustave, and Matthias Bender, as partners, have owned and operated a dairy farm, the firm name being Bender Brothers. Windom National Bank has ' an unsatisfied judgment against Howard G. and Gottlob for upwards of $1,500. Proceeding under § 28 of the uniform partnership act (2 Mason Minn. St. 1927, § 7411), it procured the appointment of its coplaintiff, Gillam, as receiver…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Malvern National Bank v. HallidaySupreme Court of Iowa · 1923
  2. Hazen v. WarwickMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
  3. Kilduff v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
  4. Wells-Dickey Trust Co. v. Chicago Burlington & Quincy RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  5. In re the Estate of DumarestNew York Surrogate's Court · 1933

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. In Re DeckerDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1969
  2. Smith v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1948
  3. Gleason v. SingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
  4. State v. ElsburyNevada Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Cecil G. Noble v. National Mines CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API