Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. v. M. St. P. S. S. M. Ry. Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 24, 1933No. 29,213PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

1 Reported in 251 N.W. 275. Mandamus, the city of St. Paul as relator appealing from an order sustaining respondent's general demurrer to petition and alternative writ.

Under the St. Paul charter the city council has general control of public parkways and highways in the city. Respondent's railroad tracks cross Wheelock Parkway, near the northerly limits of the city and about midway between Como and Phalen Parks, on what is considered a temporary, wooden trestle. February 10, 1914, by ordinance, the city council directed the construction of a permanent bridge by respondent at its own expense.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. Wells-Dickey Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Wells-Dickey Trust Co. v. Chicago Burlington & Quincy RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  3. State v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  4. City of St. Paul v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  5. State ex rel. City of St. Paul v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1933

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Wichert v. CardwellWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. Thornton Bros. Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
  3. Minneapolis Gas Co. v. ZimmermanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  4. Orme v. Atlas Gas and Oil Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  5. Fletcher v. ScottSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API