Legal Opinion

Wichert v. Cardwell

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 11, 1991No. 57264-0PublishedCited by 124 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrachtenbach, J.

At issue is the sufficiency of service of process and, more particularly, whether the method of. service here employed was reasonably calculated to accomplish service. The Court of Appeals, on a motion on the merits, affirmed the trial court's dismissal of plaintiff's lawsuit. We reverse.

Plaintiff's suit for personal injuries was filed 1 day before expiration of the statute of limitations. Plaintiff attempted service of the summons and complaint within 90 days of fifing. RCW 4.16.170.

Substitute service of process is authorized by RCW 4.28.080(14). Three separate elements must be satisfied to…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Grannis v. OrdeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. Bennett v. HardyWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Bossuk v. SteinbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Sayward v. CarlsonWashington Supreme Court · 1890

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by124 opinions

  1. Matter of Personal Restraint of YoungWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Cockle v. Dept. of Labor and IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Cockle v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  4. State v. BahlWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  5. State v. BahlWashington Supreme Court · 2008

119 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API