Legal Opinion

Teders v. Rothermel

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 16, 1939No. 32,047PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stone, Justice.

Action for personal injuries. From an order sustaining a demurrer to one part of his answer, defendant appeals.

The complaint avers as follows. In July, 1937, plaintiff, defendant, and two others planned a motor trip. The common intent was to travel from Omaha, Nebraska, to Florida and return, in defendant’s car. There was in advance an agreement that each would pay one-fourth of the cost of the needed gasoline and oil. Accordingly, each of the four did contribute to a fund from which those expenses were paid. In Florida plaintiff was injured in a collision caused by defendant’s…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Smith v. CluteNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
  2. Clendenning v. SimermanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1935
  3. Kerstetter v. ElfmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  4. State Ex Rel. v. M. St. P. S. S. M. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
  5. Wells-Dickey Trust Co. v. Chicago Burlington & Quincy RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Wichert v. CardwellWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  2. LaFage v. JaniSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2001
  3. Duncan v. HutchinsonOhio Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Long v. Board of Supervisors of Benton CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1966
  5. Fountain v. TidwellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API