Teders v. Rothermel
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Stone, Justice.
Action for personal injuries. From an order sustaining a demurrer to one part of his answer, defendant appeals.
The complaint avers as follows. In July, 1937, plaintiff, defendant, and two others planned a motor trip. The common intent was to travel from Omaha, Nebraska, to Florida and return, in defendant’s car. There was in advance an agreement that each would pay one-fourth of the cost of the needed gasoline and oil. Accordingly, each of the four did contribute to a fund from which those expenses were paid. In Florida plaintiff was injured in a collision caused by defendant’s…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Smith v. CluteNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
- Clendenning v. SimermanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1935
- Kerstetter v. ElfmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- State Ex Rel. v. M. St. P. S. S. M. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
- Wells-Dickey Trust Co. v. Chicago Burlington & Quincy RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
3Cited by23 opinions
- Wichert v. CardwellWashington Supreme Court · 1991
- LaFage v. JaniSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2001
- Duncan v. HutchinsonOhio Supreme Court · 1942
- Long v. Board of Supervisors of Benton CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1966
- Fountain v. TidwellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.