Legal Opinion
Goodman v. Best Buy, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided September 2, 2008No. A07-1820PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LANSING, Judge.
Three months after the federal district court dismissed, without prejudice, Jonathon Goodman’s removed, pendent Minnesota Human Rights Act claim, he refiled this claim in state district court. The state district court concluded that the statute-of-limitations period had expired and that 28 U.S.C. § 1367(d) (2000) allows the plaintiff only thirty days after the dismissal of a removed claim to refile that claim in state court. Because we conclude that 28 U.S.C. § 1367(d) suspended the running of the limitations period while Goodman’s case was pending in federal court, we…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Reiter v. Sonotone Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Reiter v. Sonotone Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- King v. St. Vincent's HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Holloway v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Turner v. KightCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
- City of Los Angeles v. County of KernCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
- Goodman v. Best Buy, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- In Re Vertrue Marketing and Sales Practices LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2010
- STEPHANIE C. ARTIS v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIADistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.