Legal Opinion
Reiter v. Sonotone Corp.
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided June 11, 1979No. 78-690PublishedCited by 1,253 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Burger
We granted certiorari to decide whether consumers who pay a higher price for goods purchased for personal use as a result of antitrust violations sustain an injury in their “business or property” within the meaning of § 4 of the Clayton Act, 38 Stat. 731, 15 U. S. C. § 15.
*335I
Petitioner brought a class action on behalf of herself and all persons in the United States who purchased hearing aids manufactured by five corporations, respondents here. Her complaint alleges that respondents have committed a variety of antitrust violations, including vertical and horizontal price fixing.1 Because of…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Illinois Brick Co. v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Goldfarb v. Virginia State BarSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. MenascheSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Hanover Shoe, Inc. v. United Shoe MacHinery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1,253 opinions
- Nken v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. MoitieSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Florida Power & Light Co. v. LorionSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
1,248 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.